首页> 外文OA文献 >Minifragment Screw Fixation of Oblique Metacarpal Fractures: A Biomechanical Analysis of Screw Types and Techniques
【2h】

Minifragment Screw Fixation of Oblique Metacarpal Fractures: A Biomechanical Analysis of Screw Types and Techniques

机译:微型掌骨螺钉固定骨骨折:螺钉类型和技术的生物力学分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The lag screw technique has historically been a successful and accepted way to treat oblique metacarpal fractures. However, it does take additional time and involve multiple steps that can increase the risk of fracture propagation or comminution in the small hand bones of the hand. An alternate fixation technique uses bicortical interfragmentary screws. Other studies support the clinical effectiveness and ease of this technique. The purpose of this study is to biomechanically assess the strength of the bicortical interfragmentary screw versus that of the traditional lag screw. Using 48 cadaver metacarpals, oblique osteotomies were created and stabilized using one of four methods: 1.5 mm bicortical interfragmentary (IF) screw, 1.5 mm lag technique screw, 2.0 mm bicortical IF screw, or 2.0 mm lag technique screw. Biomechanical testing was performed to measure post cyclic displacement and load to failure. Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). There was no significant difference among the fixation techniques with regard to both displacement and ultimate failure strength. There was a slight trend for a higher load to failure with the 2.0 mm IF screw and 2.0 mm lag screw compared to the 1.5 mm IF and 1.5 mm lag screws, but this was not significant. Our results support previously established clinical data that bicortical interfragmentary screw fixation is an effective treatment option for oblique metacarpal fractures. This technique has clinical importance because it is an option to appropriately stabilize the often small and difficult to control fracture fragments encountered in metacarpal fractures.
机译:从历史上讲,方头螺钉技术是治疗倾斜的掌骨骨折的一种成功且公认的方法。但是,这确实需要花费额外的时间,并且涉及多个步骤,这些步骤可能会增加手的小手骨头中骨折扩展或粉碎的风险。另一种固定技术是使用双皮质的节间螺钉。其他研究支持该技术的临床有效性和简便性。这项研究的目的是生物力学评估双皮质的节间螺钉与传统的方头螺钉的强度。使用48具尸体掌骨,使用以下四种方法之一创建并稳定了斜截骨术:1.5毫米双皮质间骨折(IF)螺钉,1.5毫米滞后技术螺钉,2.0毫米双皮质IF螺钉或2.0毫米滞后技术螺钉。进行生物力学测试以测量循环后位移和破坏载荷。使用单向方差分析(ANOVA)分析数据。固定技术之间在位移和极限破坏强度方面没有显着差异。与1.5毫米IF和1.5毫米滞后螺钉相比,使用2.0毫米IF螺钉和2.0毫米滞后螺钉有更高的失效载荷趋势,但这并不明显。我们的结果支持以前建立的临床数据,即双皮质节间螺钉固定术是治疗倾斜的掌骨骨折的有效选择。该技术具有临床重要性,因为它是适当地稳定掌骨骨折中遇到的通常较小且难以控制的骨折碎片的一种选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号